First of all, today I'm going to say "I'm sorry " to PETA (People for Ethical Treatment of Animals). But, they're going to be screaming bloody murder for people shooting pit bulls to the death.
Here, read this article: http://www.news4jax.com/news/14250768/detail.html
After I read this, there are thousands of Pit bulls of all differnt breeds through out the world. If today's death of one person where they turned on their 'masters', how much more dangerous can it be if THOUSANDS of others do the same?
Ever time I see a Pit Bull, I tell their owner to keep him controlled and away from people. They plead "but it's a tame dog! Loves people, has no history of biting". I hate to say it but I do say it: " it's a living animal gun waiting to go off without warning !" .
Today, I want you to ask yourself this question: Was it morally right that Michael Vick's dogs be spread out to adoption to other people after the life time of suffering they had with him? The answer is very questionable. Will those same dogs, after what they've been through with Vick, turn on their new masters later? I hope the people who sell them for adoption come with a written promise that the dogs won't attack their owners.
It would have been a kindness to these poor abused animals to sleep. Putting them up for adoption puts them at risk for new abuse, no matter how strong the animal adoption laws are. Michael vick's dogs should have been put to sleep.
To sum up everything: I say death to the pit bulls. Let that terrible breed die out complely. We don't need domesticated animal terror in our country.
2 comments:
There is more chance of a person being raped and killed than being killed by a dog or 50 000 times more likely die in a car crash how any people die each year from smoking your saying all pit bulls should be put to sleep but with that attitude its you that should be put to sleep you obviously know very little about the breed they are animal aggresive not human aggresive unless provoked and taught by there owners to be that way.
Mr. Bachan: If you ever have gone to a special pet store that educates you on Pit Bulls, you would know the cautions, warnings, and SPECIAL care that comes with these animals. Pit Bulls have a HIGHER AGRRESSIVE STATE OF ANGER, even when it's provoked with the smallest sense of abuse.
You say these are "cute animals" (as in the tone of your post). But they are living time bombs of their own.
Now, in the Michael Vick case, these dogs have been abused. You tell me: Will these dogs forgive and forget the abuse and trainings of fighting and love their "new Masters"?
BZZZT! Sorry, question has expired. Answer is NO. These animals still remember abuse. When their new masters try to correct their bad behavior, they will attack right back in their aggressive state.
So stand back, Mr. bachan, when more lawsuits pop up against Michael Vick when these dogs turn in on their new owners. Or better yet, when TV news pop up more deaths by pit bulls.
One last thing, Mr.Bachan, that you ought to consider. When you have been attacked by a pit bull you hadn't provoked and you are fighting for your life, ask yourself what will go through your mind before those jaws of death close in on your throat? Ask yourself why you have to kill the cute dog to save yourself? Ask the questions why would a "timid" dog attack for no reason when it's in's Pit Bull nature?
That's your question today.
I stand by what I said. Every dog owned by Michael Vick has every chance on killing it's new owners. They should be destroyed. They are living time bombs.
Post a Comment